|
Post by SnakeYukin on Jul 13, 2009 16:03:04 GMT -5
That's right, Capcom, well acutually the assistant producer of the arcade version, has stated that perhaps Seth and Sagot are a little bit overpowered: more-so than they originally planned. So we who aren't that good at Street Fighter IV now have an excuse for losing against Seth always. You can listen to my attempt of beating Seth at the end of this little article. Anyways, he says, "Yes, Seth and perhaps Sagat might have turned out a little bit stronger than we expected." Like I said, I now have a reason to tell all those stupid SF IV fanboys that the reason I can't beat Seth isn't related to my skills, it's because he's too powerful. Even the people at Capcom think he's too strong. If only he didn't also say something else. "A good player of another character can always beat a good Sagat player or a good Seth player," he said. "I don't think it's too out of proportion, but we do acknowledge that they turned out a bit more powerful than we expected." Oh well, let's just say that means that if we go against a human, we can win. Know, if we go against an AI, then we'll lose. Why can't it be like other fighting games in which I can easily win on the easiest setting? ArticleSnakeYukin Playing SF IV
|
|
SikAnTwisted
Creative Student
My God Has A Hammer, Your God Was Nailed To A Cross, Any Questions?
Posts: 70
|
Post by SikAnTwisted on Jul 20, 2009 16:03:59 GMT -5
lolol "you lose"
|
|